The PPSR is not a replacement for doing your job: what every private lender needs to know after Pedler v AFSA
Australia's Administrative Review Tribunal has ordered the removal of a Commonwealth Bank PPSR registration over a vehicle it had no legal right to claim — and called the bank's conduct unconscionable. The lessons for private lenders are clear.

The Administrative Review Tribunal's decision in Pedler v Australian Financial Security Authority is a study in what happens when a major lender treats the Personal Property Securities Register as a filing cabinet rather than a legal obligation — and then tries to use an invalid registration to block an innocent third party from dealing with their own property.
What Happened?
A small plumbing company borrowed money from the Commonwealth Bank to buy a ute. CBA registered its security interest on the PPSR. In September 2017, the company sold the ute without CBA's consent, in breach of the loan agreement. The buyer, Mr Pedler, paid $28,300 and did not search the PPSR before purchasing.
CBA took no steps to chase the vehicle or update its registration. Under the PPSA, a secured lender whose collateral has been sold without consent has a 24-month window to update its registration to reflect the new owner. Once that window closes, the buyer takes the asset entirely free of the lender's claim. That window closed for CBA in September 2019.
What happened next is striking. CBA had itself wound up the plumbing company in 2018 and was appointed as Controller — meaning it had both the power and the duty to locate and sell the ute to recover its money. It still did nothing. Then:
- CBA discharged its own registration in November 2019; and
- Lodged a new security interest over the same vehicle in June 2020.
At the point of the new registration, the plumbing company had been in liquidation for two years and owned no rights whatsoever in the ute. The company was deregistered by ASIC in January 2021.
Mr Pedler discovered CBA's registration in November 2023 — when he attempted to sell the ute for $20,000 and a car dealer spotted the encumbrance. He was blocked from selling the only asset he owned.
What Did the Tribunal Find?
The Tribunal found:
- The CBA's June 2020 registration was invalid and of no legal effect;
- The CBA's original security interest had become legally ineffective when its 24-month grace period expired in September 2019; and
- By June 2020, the plumbing company (listed as the grantor) had no rights in the vehicle — the company's debts had been extinguished when it was wound up and deregistered, leaving nothing left to secure.
The Tribunal was unsparing in its assessment of CBA's conduct:
"Not only misleading but borders on unconscionable conduct" — CBA's claim in November 2023 that money remained owing under a loan agreement when the borrower had been deregistered years earlier and "no loan contract remained on foot let alone an enforceable one."
By insisting on maintaining its invalid registration while taking no active steps to recover money from anyone, the CBA was "knowingly preventing Mr Pedler from realising an asset that he is the unencumbered owner of" — conduct described as "unconscionable if not dishonest."
The Tribunal also found that CBA had breached its obligation under the PPSA to act honestly and in a commercially reasonable manner, and ordered the registration be removed.
PPSA "Taking Free" — A Brief Recap
The PPSA contains provisions allowing a buyer of personal property to take that property free of a pre-existing security interest in certain circumstances. Pedler confirms this can occur not only where a security interest was unperfected at the time of the original sale, but also where a security interest subsequently becomes unperfected. A lender is exposed where, for example, it failed to update its registration after collateral changed hands. Once that transfer happens, (and subject to the specific exceptions for serial numbered property in section 44 of the PPSA) the buyer may take the property free of the security interest permanently and in those circumstances the lender has no recourse against the buyer for the underlying debt.
One important nuance: the PPSA requires the buyer to have provided "value." Where property is transferred for under market value, the buyer may not have the benefit of the taking free provisions — a point that was not in argument in Pedler but is worth bearing in mind.
The interaction between these provisions and the temporary perfection rules under section 34 of the PPSA is technically complex. The consequences of getting it wrong, as CBA discovered, can be severe.
Key Lessons for Private Lenders
1. Monitor collateral and act within 24 months of any transfer. If your borrower sells or transfers secured collateral — with or without your consent — a countdown begins. You have 24 months to update the PPSR to reflect the new owner. Miss that window and your security interest is extinguished.
2. Enforce promptly when a borrower enters insolvency. If your borrower enters administration or liquidation, act immediately. As a secured creditor you likely have the right to deal directly with your secured asset. Do not wait — once a company is wound up and deregistered, the debt is extinguished and your security interest becomes worthless.
3. Never discharge a registration without a plan. Once you discharge a registration, you may not be able to revive it. If discharging and re-registering for any reason, obtain legal advice first.
4. A PPSR registration does not create a security interest. Registration is notice only. Without a valid, signed security agreement with someone who actually owns the collateral, your registration is legally meaningless — regardless of whether it appears on the register.
5. Remove registrations you know are invalid. Take amendment demands seriously and seek legal advice promptly. Holding onto an invalid registration to preserve commercial leverage — without taking active steps to recover money — is not a commercially reasonable position, and as Pedler demonstrates, may be found to be unconscionable.
6. Understand that damages may follow. Removal of your registration is not necessarily the end of the matter. A person who suffers financial loss because of an invalid PPSR registration has the right to pursue damages.
The Bottom Line
The PPSR is a powerful tool — but only if you use it correctly and maintain it diligently. It is not a set-and-forget system, and it is not a mechanism for blocking an innocent third party from dealing with property you have no legitimate claim over.
Review your PPSR portfolio regularly, discharge registrations promptly when loans are repaid or borrowers are deregistered, and seek legal advice if you are unsure whether a registration remains valid.
If you would like to discuss this decision or its implications for your lending documentation, PPSR registrations, or enforcement obligations, please contact Phil Hustler.
This Baystone Legal bulletin is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Private lenders and financiers should seek specific professional advice in relation to their lending documentation, PPSR registrations, and enforcement obligations.
